Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[AMPS] SB-220 C4 failure

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [AMPS] SB-220 C4 failure
From: measures@vc.net (Rich Measures)
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 97 08:11:06 -0700
>> From:          Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>> Subject:       Re: [AMPS] SB-220 C4 failure
To: <amps@contesting.com>
>> Date:          Wed, 9 Jul 97 02:06:09 +0000
>
>I wrote:
>> >The current limits because of the components internal ESR, which was 
>> >a natural result of the low power levels (1 kW ICAS INPUT power)  and 
>> >duty cycle (less than 50%) the 220 was designed for.  Same with the 
>> >filament transformer, any properly sized transformer combined 
>> >with the resistance of the filament choke, wiring, power line 
>> >ESR, and so on would limit filament inrush. There was no special 
>> >design, it was a conventional transformer.
>
>Rich replied:
>> I disagree.  The TL-922 has a conventional-core filament transformer that 
>> delivers 48A of filament inrush current to each 3-500Z.  OTOH, the 
>> filament inrush current in a SB-220 is 23.2A per tube.  This amount of 
>> current limiting can not be explained by the ESR in the filament circuit. 
>>   (according to Eimac, the max. allowable filament inrush current for the 
>> 3-500Z is 29A)
>
>Really? Doesn't the TL-922 use a series filament string?? 
>
- Did you measure the filament inrush current in each tube in both 
amplifiers, Mr. Rauch?
  
- Does Mr. Rauch's ESR 'explanation' for the 220's minimal fil. inrush 
current wash?  It can only be explained by ohm's-law if the total ESR is 
around 70milli-ohms, which would necessarily mean that the open circuit 
voltage from the filament transformer was around 8V---which is 
measureably not the case.  

>> - The filament transformer in the SB-220 appears to be similar to the 
>> design of current-limiting transformers used in neon signs. 
>> Rich---
>
>I worked for Heath, and was involved in modernization of the 
>SB-220 series. ... ...

To the best of my knowledge, the design of the SB-220/SB-221/HL-2200 
filament transformer core was never changed.  It uses a thin, wide E/I 
lamination stack---like all of the neon-sign transformers I've seen.  
During startup, the 220's filament transformer delivers about 60% of the 
max. allowable inrush current to the 3-500Zs.  OTOH, the 220's HV 
transformer uses a thick E/I lamination stack---like all of the 
spot-welder transformers I've seen in sheet metal shops.  Spot welder 
transformers are designed to deliver high peak current.  Neon-sign 
transformers are designed to limit current.  A transformer for a C input 
filter supply must be designed to be capable of producing high peak 
current.  

Mr. Rauch:  Were you responsible for replacing the SB-221's original tune 
C with the wider-spaced tune C?
Rich---


R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K   


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions:              amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-amps@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>