>Warning: The Surgeon General has determined that this post does not
>include personal insults or exaggerated formality,
What do you call a chap who calls himself Englebert Schlong and Kurt
Schlong? If I refer to him as Mr. Schlong, I can't go wrong.
>so readers of the
>Amps Reflector might not find it stimulating!
>
Stimulation may be a bit of an exaggeration.
>... All I can say is that I've
>probably learned more about the individuals concerned than about
>amplifiers!
I try to concentrate on things technical, Chris. However, a substantive
technical review that puts someone's guru in an unfavorable light is sure
to start a fight.
A test: go to Will's 266k-word vhf parasitics debate archive, search
for the word 'IDIOTIC'. How many times did each combatant and each
sycophant use the word?
>........ I was given a few vague answers,
>in line with my suppositions stated in the original question. It
>took a direct request to a known expert .....
Was this 'expert' a participant on [AMPS], Chris?
Rich---
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|