To: <amps@contesting.com>
>>Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 13:15:23 -0500
>>To: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net>
>>From: Phil Clements <philk5pc@connect.net>
>>Subject: Re: [AMPS] Re: skin depth suppression
>>
>At 09:48 AM 5/24/97 -0700, you wrote:
>....snip....
>>..... ..... ... Wes' scientific measurements of 3-500Z suppressors indicated
>> that a adding a few ohms of ESR in Ls lowered the VHF-Rp of the DUT from
>>166-ohms to 101 ohms...
>>
>But alas..Wes blew off the significance of the 65 ohm drop; discounting it
>as "not a dime's worth of difference."
True. However, Wes' comment about the likely licking duties of my
secretary appeared to discount Wes' evaluation by about two cents. . . .
OTOH, if Mr. Rauch turns out to be right about VHF voltage-amplification
being INVERSELY proportional to VHF-Rp, then 166-ohms of Rp IS
substantively better than 101 ohms of Rp, which means that both Wes AND
Rich will be absolutely, positively WRONG.
>snip.....
>
>(((73)))
>Phil, K5PC
Rich---
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|