>Rich Measures wrote:
>>I repeatedly asked the naysayers in the Rauchian camp to design a
>>suppressor (with a 0-ohm ESR Ls) that would replace the c. 5-ohm ESR
>>Ni-Cr-Fe AG6K suppressor that Wes measured.
>
>I am not in anybody's "camp". I listen to other people's evidence -
>including Rich's - but I do my own independent thinking.
>
>>Ian White announced that he
>>could do so. He did not.
>
>Because it was a trivial exercise, not worth doing. Wes Stewart's
>measurements showed that the Rp values of the AG6K suppressors and the
>conventional ones were already almost the same at VHF.
...snip...
101 ohms of Rp is almost the same as 166 ohms of Rp, Ian? (@100MHz)
Rich---
R. L. Measures, 805-386-3734, AG6K
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
|