WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] FW: how many still upgrade WriteLog on Windows 95, 98, M

To: "'Hal Kennedy'" <halken@comcast.net>, "'Writelog'" <writelog@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] FW: how many still upgrade WriteLog on Windows 95, 98, ME, or NT?
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Reply-to: lists@subich.com
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:28:29 -0500
List-post: <writelog@contesting.com">mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
> Since I no longer have Wayne's email address Ill reply here.
> I'm not sure what "NT" means.  I run a five computer network 
> in the ham shack - all the computers run Windows 2000NT 
> Professional.  Is that "NT?"

Windows NT is Windows 4 - the first true 32 bit version of 
the Windows operating system and first version of Windows 
that was not built on an MSDOS base.  It was the predecessor 
to Windows 2000. 

Even Windows 2000 is getting a bit long in the tooth ... 
Mainstream Support ended the end of June 2005 and Extended 
Support will expire next year.  It is probably time to 
consider an update to one of the currently supported versions.  
I doubt that you will see support for "retired" operating 
systems in either of the other two major Windows based contest 
loggers.  

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
  




> -----Original Message-----
> From: writelog-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:writelog-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Hal Kennedy
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:26 PM
> To: 'Writelog user group'
> Subject: [WriteLog] FW: how many still upgrade WriteLog on 
> Windows 95, 98,ME, or NT?
> 
> 
> 
> Since I no longer have Wayne's email address Ill reply here.
> I'm not sure what "NT" means.  I run a five computer network 
> in the ham shack - all the computers run Windows 2000NT 
> Professional.  Is that "NT?"
> 
> They all run great, they all have nice fast LPT ports and
> multiple COM ports and they all run WRITELOG at high speed 
> with zero glitches.  I don't plan to EVER replace the OS I 
> use for ham radio logging.  Every ham radio related 
> application I use, and I use a lot of them, run fine on WIN 2000.
> 
> It would be a shame if WL won't run on my network in the
> future.  As a big fan and supporter of WL over many years, 
> non-operability with Windows 2000 would probably send me to N1MM.
> 
> 73, Hal
> N4GG
>    


_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>