Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Insulated wire, theory

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Insulated wire, theory
From: "Lux, Jim" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:01:59 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 9/21/22 12:26 PM, Tom Osborne Sr. wrote:
Can't we just put up an antenna and see where it is resonant and adjust it
accordingly? 73
Tom W7WHY

For a dipole or inverted V, esp with a tuner, that works.

If you're doing some sort of multi element array, then you might care more.

And there's the intellectual curiosity  - There's two approaches - one is to make some empirical measurements and derive a "correction factor" table, for which you don't need to understand "why" it does what it does.  The other is to figure out theoretically what's going on, and then use that in a modeling code.

The "correction factor" approach probably works pretty well close to resonance, but maybe it doesn't work so well at 2x or 3x resonance.




On Wed, Sep 21, 2022, 7:49 AM Lux, Jim <jim@luxfamily.com> wrote:

On 9/21/22 6:58 AM, Lux, Jim wrote:
A discussion of how NEC4 does insulated wires (in short, by changing
the wave number of the propagation in the conductor) can be found in
the NEC4 Theory Manual.  Search for NEC4TheoryMan.pdf and there's
several copies out there.


I suspect that EZNEC does it by a similar approach - changing the
length of the wire to a slightly shorter length to accommodate the
slower propagation in the insulated wire. That may have been done
semi-empirically


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>