Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Effects of Oxidation on Copper Antenna Wire

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Effects of Oxidation on Copper Antenna Wire
From: Michael Tope <W4EF@ca.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 20:16:28 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/24/2018 2:43 PM, jimlux wrote:
On 4/24/18 12:05 PM, Shawn Donley wrote:
Some recent posts on grounding reminded me of something I've always wondered about.   How is the radiation efficiency of a copper wire HF antenna affected by oxidation of the copper over time?   Empirical evidence is that any effects are small/negligible, otherwise the dipole you put up last year would not work so well this year.  My limited understanding is that the two oxides of copper, Cuo and Cu2O, are semiconductors.  So after a while, the outside of the wire is covered by something approaching an insulator (relative to clean copper conductivity).  The depth of the oxide, as far as I could research, is on the order of 100 nano-meters.  OK...so the RF current is forced under the oxide and follows the skin depth with frequency relationship.  Not much effect on the current or the "RF resistance" of the wire, if I can be forgiven for using that term.  But what about stranded copper wire?  That's where things might get interesting.  Does the skin effect with clean copper wi
re
   cause the RF to stay on the outside of the overall collection of strands, all of which have good contact with their adjacent strands?

Yes - and even if the strands are insulated from each other (this would be like litz wire).  It's the magnetic field that "pushes" the current to the outside, and that's there whether it's one solid conductor or multiple separate conductors.

When you start to get "semiconductive" layers, it gets more exciting, of course.


 If so, what happens when all the individual strands are oxidized and not in low resistance contact with their partners?    Anyone know of actual measurements of the effects of oxidation or how such a measurement would be done?   Short of measuring the Q of a tuned circuit built with "clean" and oxidized wire inductors, I'm not sure how you could measure the effect and even less sure of how those measurements would translate to the original question...effects on the radiation efficiency of an antenna.


You'd have to be careful about measuring the Q of a tuned circuit - parasitic L and C might have a bigger effect.  About 15-20 years ago, there were a bunch of Tesla coilers trying to quantify such effects on their systems (if you wind your coil on PVC pipe, which is hygroscopic, does the Q change with humidity) - the effects are noticeable, but non-trivial to measure.


I'd build a two wire line and short the far end, and measure the impedance.  Short rather than open, because I'm thinking coax and microwaves, and good shorts are easier than good opens, which radiate - for this purpose, probably no difference.

It affects the loss term  in the antenna radiation efficiency - probably small (after all people don't go out and try to build Yagis out of copper or silver tubing).

Where antenna resistance starts to really get you is when there are high circulating currents - a compact magnetic loop is a good example.  A very high gain multi-element Yagi might be another.  A very close spaced W8JK array is another.

Jim, et al:

The individual conductor strands that make up the shielded braid of a coax cable follow a helical pattern with half the conductors wound CW and the other half wound CCW around the dielectric. I never really thought about it before tonight, but there is probably some common ratio (greater than 1) between the length of a individual conductor and the length of the cable. If the individual conductors in the braid became truly insulated from one another, I would expect that the DC resistance of the braid would increase by a factor somewhat close to the aforementioned shield conductor strand length to cable length ratio.

73, Mike W4EF..........

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>