On the last low, 40 was open world wide around the clock with strong
signals for several days. 20 was non existent.
73, Roger (K8RI)
On 7/23/2017 Sunday 8:59 PM, Bob Shohet, KQ2M wrote:
Gary,
The lower the better? Rare when higher is better? Seriously?
Just for an example, I operated WPXSSB and WPXCW full-time (36 hours) with my 5/5/5 on 20, 5/5/5/5
on 15 and 5/5/5/5 on 10. At no time was my lowest 20 meter 5L Hygain @ 58’ even close to
being the best antenna for EU. Even the middle 5L @ 82’ was down almost the entire time both
weekends to the 5L @ 130’. Yes, geomagnetic cndx were extremely disturbed, but we had some
sunspots. In 18 months they will be flatline and high angle high band signals from EU will be
almost non-existent for the vast majority of the bottom of the cycle. As it has been for at least
the past 4 sunspot cycles that I have operated in.
15 and 10 will be even worse.
My qth is in Western Connecticut about 10 miles from the W2 border so EU should
be even more high angle from here than for you in W9 or for Jeff in W0.
There will be occasional times when a DX station might be briefly louder on a lower
antenna than a higher one, but for the next 4 years that will be the exception rather
than the rule and my stacks on 10, 15 and 20 provide a great testing ground for the
signal arrival angles. This is even true for South America which is the closest
continent and one might think should have stronger signal strengths with lower
antennas. They don’t, at least from the East Coast. Higher is still better.
As we progress into the new sunspot cycle and the spots return, lower antennas will perform
progressively better and near the peak of the cycle, you can watch the the arrival angles of signals
change rapidly – the top opens the band, then shortly after it opens, the middle or second
antenna down becomes loudest then the lower one and then the lowest. This happens on all the high
bands 10 – 20. But now we are the opposite end of the cycle – where you want your
antennas to be higher rather than lower. Signal arrival angles change throughout the opening, but
the highest antennas predominate now and will continue to do so for the next few years.
As valuable as books and computer plots can be, there is nothing like actively operating
contests to see how the propagation and arrival angles change throughout the contest on each
of the bands with stations from every part of the globe. And being able to switch phasing
combinations instantaneously provides useful real-time data as to which antennas are actually
(not theoretically) “hearing best” at any time. Hearing is believing!
73
Bob KQ2M
From: StellarCAT
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 7:33 PM
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff angle
If you are using the HFTA from the ARRL AB then you have all that info there
already! It’s the Elevation File. They have one for every state for EU, AFR,
AS etc etc ...
for the most part the lower the better... there are times, rare, when higher
is actually better. For example I can select top/bottom/BIP/BOP with 2
stacked 20 meter yagis using a RemoteQTH match ... the TOP is never the best
(for all practical purposes) so the choices are BIP, BOT, BOP in that order
... and indeed there are times, like in the afternoon going from here to
Africa where the BOP position can be as much as 10 db stronger than the BIP.
The differences are 8° and 19° for my terrain and location.
Be sure to put YOUR local terrain profile in. Either manually (not as bad as
some make it out to be) or using Stu, K6TU's site... unless its flat there
might well be some differences ... I literally used HFTA as one of the top
criteria (for me it was THE top) in selecting where we moved to when moving
back to SC! On some paths there can be 10's of db enhancement (or
degradation!)
Gary
K9RX
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Clemons
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 2:35 PM
To: 'Jeff Draughn'
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com ; Dave@egh.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Takeoff angle
A number of years ago Dean Straw gave some presentations on takeoff angles.
His presentation included a big binder of information (I think called "All
the Right Angles"). I don't remember who published it, perhaps K8CC or
possibly K3LR.
Dave K1VUT
-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jeff
Draughn
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2017 12:39 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Takeoff angle
I've been playing around with HFTA trying to figure out the best height/
configuration for my antennas and it dawned on me I wasn't sure what the
best take off angles are. I know low is better than high for DX, I'm
assuming it's a range that I'm looking for.
When looking at the plots what would be considered good take off angles for
DX contests from the midwest.
What is considered too high of an angle for DX?
Thanks
Jeff, N0OST
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|