To: | "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>, "rxdesign@ssvecnet.com" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>, "jim.thom@telus.net" <jim.thom@telus.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] RF resistance of copper oxides |
From: | "dfaklis@frontiernet.net" <dfaklis@frontiernet.net> |
Reply-to: | "dfaklis@frontiernet.net" <dfaklis@frontiernet.net> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2016 14:30:01 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Here's some additional reading on this topic. We typically decide to neglect the effect, but it is non-zero. http://g3ynh.info/zdocs/comps/part_1.html http://rudys.typepad.com/ant/files/antenna_wire_conductor.pdf http://k6mhe.com/n7ws/Plating.pdf 73, Dean, NW2K --------------- ...that the tarnish would be more like insulation and the current would simply flow through the copper below (low resistance path) ... ...Dull and tarnished has zero effect...The rf current simply travels beneath the tarnish. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Wire 4-squares - they work ! (GAIN?), Jim Thomson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Wire 4-squares - they work ! (long), Mike Smith VE9AA |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] RF resistance of copper oxides, David Gilbert |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Legs of a 60' piece of tower being dragged while being lifted, TexasRF--- via TowerTalk |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |