Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground

To: James Setzler <jms_k1sd@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] HF2V Elevated or On Ground
From: Ken <ken@wa0sbu.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:13:19 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
James;
     Just out of Curiosity, how did you elevate the radials?  

Ken



On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 15:48 -0500, James Setzler wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
>  
> 
> I've a Butternut HF2V that used to be elevated with the feedpoint at 10 ft.
> and 2 tuned radials each on 40m and 80m also at 10 ft.  I was satisfied with
> it; it seemed to hear well enough and I often got good signal reports on
> 40m.  During reconstruction I moved it to ground mounted with 12 radials
> each 10 to 33 ft. long; it's not getting many more.  I also installed a 40m
> inverted V with the feedpoint at 65 ft.
> 
>  
> 
> The ground mounted HF2V seems to be worse that the elevated vertical was.
> The elevated vertical often got good signal reports; the ground mounted
> never.  The dipole always beats the vertical, listening and transmitting.
> 
>  
> 
> Anyone else have experience with the HF2V mounted up using elevated radials
> versus ground mounted with limited on-ground radials.
> 
>  
> 
>     73 James K1SD
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>