| To: | "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] trees and verticals |
| From: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@rac.ca> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:35:12 -0800 (PST) |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
AB7E wrote: "That doesn't make sense. The ultimate lossy element....." Actually, it does make sense, but it is an incomplete statement. It was supposed to be. I will try to avoid any use of subtlety or irony in future. 73 Roger VE3ZI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Trees and Verticals, Dan Schaaf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Trees and Verticals, Gary Schafer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, K8RI |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, Roger Parsons |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |