| To: | Roger Parsons <ve3zi@rac.ca> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals |
| From: | Frank <frankkamp@att.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:08:21 -0600 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Roger Parsons wrote: >Eddy and others > >I am a little unconvinced by some of the arguments that have been presented. > > I am a LOT unconvinced. I was waiting for someone to finally figure out that the metal pole being discussed could actually be a vertical antenna. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, Roger Parsons |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, Rik van Riel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, Roger Parsons |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] trees and verticals, David Gilbert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |