Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners

["Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>]

Now this is cool!

http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/tuner/tuner.html

73
Jim W7RY


--------------------------------------------------
From: "Dan Hearn" <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 5:52 PM
To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tuners

> ARRL tested and reported the results for a number of available tuners. 
> They
> tested them 160-10meters with various loads. I remember that all were very
> inefficient with low impedance loads on the low bands. I believe the tests
> were reported in QST in 1995.
>  The 43 foot verticals being sold by a number of companies have very low 
> Ra
> on the low bands and would tax the capabilities of the best tuners
> available. These antennas are too long for the bands above 20m and are 
> cloud
> warmers.
>  If you are interested in a really serious analysis of these antennas you
> can see the work done by VK1OD here.
> http://www.vk1od.net/antenna/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm
>
> 73, Dan, N5AR
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3284 - Release Date: 11/27/10
> 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk