Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] new tower

To: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] new tower
From: "jeremy-ca" <km1h@jeremy.mv.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:02:56 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I disagree that its faster. It all depends upon the competence and 
experience of the crew. I was part of a small group who installed 100' of 
25G plus a 4el 20M yagi with rotator in one day. Most of us had worked 
together before and it was a piece of cake.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "W7CE" <w7ce@curtiss.net>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] new tower


>>    For construction purposes, burying the base in  concrete is much 
>> easier
>> and faster IMO.
>
> Wouldn't this violate the LXC Prime Directive for Rohn 25G through 65G
> towers?  As far as I can tell, the latest Rohn catalog specifies pier pin
> bases only for guyed towers.  I suppose you might find an engineer who 
> would
> sign off on a conrete buried base.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>