| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Guyed towers flexible restrains |
| From: | Mark Foigel <markfoigel@012.net.il> |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:38:52 +0100 |
| List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Hi,
Computing the mast itself:
What will be the adequate model so to assess rigidity of the partial
restrains ("spring type"), as normally provided by the guys in a continuous
beam model assumption for the mast?
Appreciate a lot,
Mark
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.17.12/654 - Release Date: 27/01/2007
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] Ground Rods, WarrenWolff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed towers flexible restrains, Hank Lonberg |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] dx engineering 20DX5 monobander questions, john |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Guyed towers flexible restrains, Hank Lonberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |