To: | ny6dx@aim.com, towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 160m inverted l |
From: | "AB2E Darrell" <ab2e@hotmail.com> |
Reply-to: | ab2e@comcast.net |
Date: | Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:12:25 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Greetings OM, I'm wondering if you used tuned radials? I had a similar problem at my old QTH when I put up a 160m inverted L, prior to tuning the radials. I used the formula found in the Butternut tech notes 240/freqMHz. I used insulated #12 wire for both the antenna and the tuned radials (the radials were just strung along a fence and not really raised, but just 3 of them worked well anyway). 73 Darrell AB2E From: ny6dx@aim.com To: towertalk@contesting.com Subject: [TowerTalk] 160m inverted l Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 18:01:18 -0500 _________________________________________________________________ View Athlete?s Collections with Live Search http://sportmaps.live.com/index.html?source=hmemailtaglinenov06&FORM=MGAC01 _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] CW Guying, Jim Chaggaris |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Code test eliminated - Eliminate THIS!, hdmc38 |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 160m inverted l, ny6dx |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Ham IV vs Yaesu, Robert Chudek - KØRC |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |