>From the ARRL Antenna book:
Surface Type Conductivity (S/m)
Fresh water .001
Salt water 5.0
Pastoral hills (dallas!) .0303
etc
Fresh water is about the worst ground system there is, according to
this table. In terms of conductivity, anyway. It does have a very
high dielectric constant, which helps reflect RF, too.
73, Martin AA6E
--- Bryan W5KFT <w5kft@nts-online.net> wrote:
> The recent discussions on conductivity have talked about different
> soil types and saltwater. Is there any information available about
> conductivity for antennas mounted above "fresh" water (ie lakes)
>
> Is the additional conductivity worth the hassle for installation
> above a LARGE body of fresh water?
> Trying to figure out if its worth it to use Lake Buchanan, Texas (8
> miles wide, 35 miles long)
>
> Bryan W5KFT
> _______________________________________________
>
> See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
> "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,
> 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather
Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|