| Understand. However in this case we are not trying
to confirm loobes in the vertical plane. We are trying
to improve the near field to get less R-loss, that we
can confirm and measure without using helicopters.
Lets stick to the original issue. 
 73 Jim SM2EKM
----------------------------------------------- Jim Lux wrote:
 At 05:09 PM 12/18/2003 +0100, Jan Erik Holm wrote:
 
 You need no helicopter. In practical sense just
measure the ground wave.
We are not trying to confirm loobes in the vertcal
plane, then you need helicopters. 73 Jim SM2EKM
 
 
 But, for HF skywave communications, you ARE very concerned about the 
skywave.  The near and midfield (say, out to 10-20 wavelengths) will 
have a huge effect on what the pattern looks like close to the ground, 
or, at least up to 20-30 degrees, which is usually what folks are 
worried about.
 
 It would be very, very difficult to relate, with any confidence, the 
measurements you might make at ground level to the gain at 5,10, or 20 
degrees above the horizon. (unless you're like Rick Karlquist, with an 
antenna out Galt,CA in the middle of a flatter than Kansas plain with 
fairly uniform soil characteristics for miles in every direction)
 
 A very small change in the soil characteristics radically changes the 
depth of the "null" at the horizon for horizontally polarized antennas 
over ground. Less of an effect for the vertically polarized antennas. 
Since almost all practical antenna systems radiate both polarizations, 
and the skywave itself is fairly randomly polarized, such things are 
important.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---------------------
 Jim Lux wrote:
 
 
 Hard to do, in a practical sense... You'd need a measurement receiver 
in anairplane, helicopter, balloon etc, because the field strength at "ground
 level" isn't really what you're interested.
 Perhaps measuring beacons before and after?  But you've got the 
propagation
 variations to worry about.
 This is why evaluating HF antennas is such a royal pain.
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Jan Erik Holm" <sm2ekm@telia.com>
 To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
 Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:37 PM
 Subject: [TowerTalk] Re: One more ground radial question
 
 
 
 Is something like this ever confirmed by field
strenght measurements? 
 73 Jim SM2EKM
-------------------------------------------------- Don Havlicek wrote:
 
 
 Yes!In my case ... 60 radials spaced 6 degrees apart .. then 
concentrations
 of ten radials at 1 degree each for Europe, Japan, South America, and
 VK/ZL ... works like gangbusters .. all I need now is to clean out the
 shack and put a new feedline out to the vertical again!
 Don
 N8DE
 
 va3pl@cuic.ca wrote:
 
 
 
 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Havlicek" <n8de@thepoint.net>
To: <kb9cry@comcast.net>
Cc: <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] One more ground radial question 
 
 
 
 I believe the word "optimum" should be replaced with "sufficient".
My experience with verticals tells me that 100 radials works much
better than 60, especially when concentrated in certain directions.
 ,
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 
 See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless
 Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 
with any
 questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
 
 
 _______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
 
 See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", 
"Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 
1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
 
 
 _______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
 
 _______________________________________________
 
 See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with 
any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
 
 
 _______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 
 
 _______________________________________________
 
 See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.
 
 
 _______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 
 |