Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] re: The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] re: The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground?
From: rick@area.com (rick@area.com)
Date: 23 Dec 1999 05:02:40 -0000
> From: Henry A Pollock <k4tmc@juno.com>
> Subject: [TowerTalk] The Ultimate (Perfect) Ground? - Think Piece
> 
> Handbook, it appears that saltwater represents a ?perfect ground.?  And
> right on the beach, you have a perfect ground in both the near field and
> far field.  It appears that with 120 radials of 1/2 wavelength, you can
> obtain a reasonable perfect ground in the near field (re Ant. Hndbk. Chpt
> 3 - Table 1).  Realizing that it would be impractical to try to obtain a
> far field perfect ground in all directions (360 degrees), what about
> trying to implement this in one direction?  For those of us on the East
> Coast, 45 degrees puts one right in the center of Europe.  Could it be

I tried this on 20 meters.  I laid out 60 radials 250 feet long in a
45 degree sector pointed towards Europe.  It produced no improvement 
with a 1/4 wave vertical and 2 to 3 dB improvement (to Europe only)
for a 1/2 wave vertical.  I also did simulations up to 1000 radials
500 feet long on NEC3-GS.  Bottom line is that you cannot (practically)
simulate being on the beach with ground wires.  Complete details are
on my web site:  <<http://www.karlquist.com>> .

Rick Karlquist N6RK

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>