Bill,
For 60 ft at HF, neither ladder line or catv hardline is worth the
hassle. Run it nice and clean with a good RG213/U and forget it for 10
-15 years.
73,
Press Jones, N8UG
The Wireman, Inc., Landrum, SC 29356
use n8ug@juno.com or (864) 895-4195 for tech help
orders only use 800-727-WIRE(9473) or cqwire@juno.com
http://www.thewireman.com
On Wed, 29 Oct 1997 11:21:48 -0500 wbh3@chrysler.com writes:
>I have 2 questions:
>
>I recently obtained some 75 ohm hardline from my cable company. In
>talking to the gentleman who gave it to me (and is also a ham with a
>lot of antenna experience), I asked him about a means of matching the
>75 ohm hardline to the 50 ohm input for my Icom 765. His comment was
>basically not to even bother or worry about it.....just hook it up and
>go for it. While he certainly seems to know what he is talking about,
>I am still curious as to whether this will work as easily as he says
>it
>will?
>
>second question: I have also heard (and wondered why not) that
>instead of using coax to feed my beam, that I should just try 400
>ohm ladder line (I assume with a proper balun of some kind) to feed
>the beam and I should get real good results with minimum loss. Since
>I
>am only going to have a short run of about 60 feet to the beam, why
>not use the ladder line instead of the more expensive coax? It seems
>that I have only heard of a few stations that use this method,
>everyone
>else going with the standard coax. Comments please!
>
>
>Regards, Bill - WX8S
>wbh3@chrysler.com
>
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
>Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search
|