I should have stated for the comparison that I have 4 elevated radials under
the inverted L W2LL
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 19, 2020, at 12:49 PM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>
> An Inverted "L" is more or less a vertical, but the upper half got bent
> over correct?
>
> So a major part of an inverted "L" just as in a regular vertical is the
> ground system.
> Correct?
>
> Now how elevated radials work great in a regular vertical, only need like 4
> to equal miles of wire in ground mounted radial field.
>
> Will elevated radials work for an inverted "L"?
>
> How about few and shorter than full length elevated radials as in a N6BT
> design?
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> <CLEAN-IDLE-TYME-LOGO-120x96.jpg>
>
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 4/19/2020 11:35 AM, daraymond@iowatelecom.net wrote:
>> The inverted L will out perform and inverted vee, hands down, 90% of the
>> time. The few exceptions will probably be near your local SR (and other
>> times) when horizontal polarization can work better. 73. . .
>> Dave, W0FLS
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Peter Krulewitch
>> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 11:28 AM
>> To: topband@contesting.com
>> Subject: Topband: Inverted V vs inverted L
>>
>> Have used inverted L with 90 apex for several years but wonder whether
>> comparison tests or experiences with inverted V at that height compares. Tnx
>> fer your ideas.W2LL
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>> _________________
>> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
>>
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|