Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: The Idiot's Guide To Bi-Directional Two-Wire BeverageConstr

To: "Eddy Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: The Idiot's Guide To Bi-Directional Two-Wire BeverageConstruction...
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:53:14 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Just how important is a continuos pre-set distance between the wires, anyway...? And who was it that came up with the necessity of equally-spaced wire...? And how did they determine the "optimum" distance the wires...? Would a span of power line cord (a.k.a. "zip cord") do in a pinch...?
Eddy,

The transmission line mode of the two wires is what brings the far end of the antenna to the feedpoint. That is what allows the antenna to be reversed.
If that line is lossy, or if that line is mismatched by just 2.5:1 SWR and 
the wrong length, the antenna can easily lose 20 dB of null depth when in 
the forward (fires away from feedpoint) direction.
In the reverse direction, where the antenna fires toward the feedpoint 
direction, mismatch or loss only affects signal level. SWR or loss does not 
affect F/B in the "reverse" directional mode.
You can use any impedance of line you desire if transformers are readjusted 
to the correct ratio, and you can even use coaxial cable for the antenna. 
The problem comes in when the line has greatly unstable impedance, velocity 
factor, and/or loss, and the major problem is mostly in one direction.
I'd avoid exceptionally lossy lines and lines that significantly change 
characteristics with weather conditions.
It is easier to make good transformers when impedance ratio of antenna mode 
to transmission line mode is close to unity. That's why 400-600 ohm line 
spacings are usually best.
73 Tom 

_______________________________________________
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>