To: | "Topband" <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: 160 m use |
From: | "Lennart M" <lennart.michaelsson@telia.com> |
Date: | Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:39:32 +0200 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Have you studied what IARU says about the 160 m bandplan? To summarize: SSB is allowed "all over the place"! We can never expect ITU or even the national authorities to take action in order to divide this band into segments. With the present statements from IARU any narrow band mode is allowed anywhere on 160. I suggest we all take action to have frequencies below 1830 protected from anything but CW. Above 1830 CW, SSB and RTTY should be allowed separately or in combination, ie SSB/CW mixed QSO:s. 73 Len SM7BIC _______________________________________________ UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: SK: W9SU, Owner of Industrial Communication Engineers (ICE), donovanf |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: 160 Not Dead Yet, Chortek, Robert L |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: ICE 196 notes from W8WWV and K3LR, Tim Duffy K3LR |
Next by Thread: | Topband: 160 m use, Lennart M |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |