Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Topband: Adding radials, a question

To: w5un@wt.net
Subject: RE: Topband: Adding radials, a question
From: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 12:34:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Dave,

While I am no expert on the issue of radials, There are many good articals, I've found some of the best about vertical theory in dealing with the Butternutt Verticals.

http://www.bencher.com/pdf_download.html ( at the bottom of this page is a very good section on Vertical theory under Tech Notes )

As I understand it for ground mounted verticals, as you put in more radials, the 'Q' gets higher. Especially for for low bands (160 & 80) Thus as the radials increase, the radiation resistance increases ( the good kind ) and and the ground loss or ground resistance decreases ( the bad kind ). Excuse my teminoligy here. So the total resistance approaches the more perfect 35 ohm vertical impedence. Obviously, it can never be fully acheived but the point is this, when the Q stops rising appreciably, you've probably put in enough radials for the amount of wire you have in the air.

Of important note here is that the length of the radial isn't really important as the ground detunes them, but the need to be somewhere about as long as the height fo the vertical.

The way I measued was to see how wide the 2:1 SWR frequency band width using 259 analyzer. The more narrow the 2:1 width, the better the radiation resistance will be. Then use a small amount of power, 20 to 50 watts to double check. The 259 is very suseptable to AM radio stations at those frequencies even if they are not near by.

In my case the best answer was 40 radial going out 30 feet 9 degrees apart.

All of this changes fairly significantly when the vertical is raised above ground. So keep that in mind.

Best 73's
Rich
K5SF







From: W5UN <w5un@wt.net>
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Topband: Adding radials, a question
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:14:36 +0000

I have a question for any of you who have experience with adding radials
and making measurements of the changing impedance on a 1/4 wl ground plane.

I have a 1/4 wl 80 meter GP made from #12 AWG copper wire, with a 3/16 wl
radius ground screen beneath it on the ground surface. The vertical is
suspended from a Dacron line strung between two towers approximately 250
feet apart. As it is, the impedance of the GP measures 43+j0 ohms at 3.525
MHz. I am thinking of converting this antenna to a "T" vertical on 160
meters. I know that the ground plane needs some improvement for this, so I
cut some radials to 1/4 wl on 1.8 MHz, and began to add them in groups of
four. While doing this, I thought I might as well see how the additional
radials were affecting impedance of the 3.5 MHz GP. To my great surprise,
the impedance went from 43+j0 ohms with only the ground screen, to 48+j0
with the ground screen plus four radials.  Then jumped to 51+j0 with eight
of these new radials plus original ground screen. The resonant frequency
did not change, nor did I expect it to.

This seems to fly in the face of theory, which says that the antenna
impedance should approach 36 ohms, or so, as losses are reduced to near
zero. Can someone explain what is going on here?

FYI, the ground screen consists of a grid of #14 AWG house wiring, on four
foot centers, bonded at each crossing intersection.



73, Dave - W5UN w5un@wt.net

homepage: http://web.wt.net/~w5un Grid: EM23mg

RR 10, Box 27
Mount Pleasant, TX 75455

_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>