TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles
From: "Steve Ireland" <vk6vz@arach.net.au>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 17:48:13 +0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oops, sorry about the typo - that should have been 220 countries. 

From: Steve Ireland 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:25 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com 
Subject: OT: Working DX on 160m with low dipoles

“Low dipoles on 160m are pretty worthless for working DX”

------------------------

As the song goes, “it ain’t necessarily so”.  A lot depends upon your ground 
conductivity, geomagnetic latitude and what time of night you transmit at.

I have 320 countries worked on 160m from VK6, basically all with ‘low dipoles’ 
(ranging from 30 to 90 feet in height), mainly worked close to sunrise/sunset 
(i.e. plus or minus fifteen minutes) when high angle propagation often 
dominates over low angle. One of my best contacts with a 45’ high dipole was 
VP5/WA2VYA, who was away from the sea and running about 100W to a inverted vee 
dipole about 15’ high. I was operating just after my sunset and he was very 
close to his sunrise – and a solid RST 559.

In most parts of the world, an inverted-L 1/4 wave fed against a simple K2AV or 
Moxon type counterpoise will be better, but not from everywhere. As the great 
G6XN used to say, try vertical polarisation AND horizontal polarisation from 
wherever you live and then use whichever works best for you.

Vy 73

Steve, VK6VZ      



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>