TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 539

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 539
From: n3wm <n3wm@qis.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:55:11 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Hi Rod,

I've had my 539 since March and find it to be a great rig. I'm an avid CW operator and the 539 is very good..especially the receiver. That is the main reason I decided to go with the 539. I wanted a very good receiver to operate QRP or use as a second receiver for my Omni VII. When using it as a second receiver I am able to turn the RF power down to absolute zero to protect the Omni VII. This summer I ran the 539 barefoot into a simple attic dipole and was able to work into Europe (on CW) frequently.

I encourage you to see the reviews on eham...most are very good. It is an SDR radio which allows Ten Tec to improve the feature set and to make other improvements. The only feature missing in my opinion is VOX. This is in the works. John Henry of Ten Tec engineering has been very good about keeping the Ten Tec user groups informed. If you already own a Ten Tec rig you know about the great factory support. BTW HRD and some of the other log control programs work fine.

I hope this helps in your decision.

73's

Bill N3WM









On 11/17/2013 1:45 PM, Rodney wrote:
ANYONE USING A TEN TEC 539 AND HOW DO YOU LIKE IT.      73 ROD  W3KRQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>