Thank you for the suggestion Jim,
I have given the Eagle some consideration over the past few months. That
appears to be a
fine radio and I may go that way but I like the size, operating voltage range
and power drain
of the Argonaut VI and the ability to get to 100 watts if needed (rarely) by
adding the 418. I
have never made a contact on 60 or 12 so I won't miss those. The Argonaut VI
receiver
appears to be identical to the Eagle in most areas according to the specs.
Kinda' looking for
a modern Scout! So...I'm just waiting for some more field reports
73 es Happy New Year,
-Lee-
WA3FIY
On 28 Dec 2012 at 17:45, Jim Lowman wrote:
> Lee, why not spend a few bucks more and get the Eagle, unless you plan
> to take the 539/418 pair out of the shack?
>
> With the Eagle, you get a better receiver, more filter slots, full
> 160-6m coverage, and an available internal ATU. All of those have been
> criticisms of the Argonaut VI.
>
> 73 de Jim - AD6CW
>
> On 12/28/2012 7:54 AM, Lee WA3FIY wrote:
> > Greetings all,
> >
> > Anyone here using the Argonaut VI / 418 combination? If so what are
> > your impressions so far?
> >
> > I'm thinking that might be a nice replacement for the Jupiter.
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > -Lee-
> >
> > WA3FIY
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|