TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Re: FT-1000D A/B Test Results

To: <TenTec_Orion@yahoogroups.com>, <TenTec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Re: [TenTec_Orion] Re: FT-1000D A/B Test Results
From: "Roger Borowski" <K9RB@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: Roger Borowski <K9RB@arrl.net>, tentec@contesting.com
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:27:26 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: just_rtfm 
  To: TenTec_Orion@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 1:03 AM
  Subject: [TenTec_Orion] Re: FT-1000D A/B Test Results


  i learned scientific method and statistics while getting a masters. 
  peer review is a good thing. your points are well taken but let me 
  share another perspective: lab specs are great, but what about their 
  cummulative real-world effect? how many more stations will radio A 
  hear over radio B? 

  given brake horsepower and curb weight which car is faster? which 
  spec means more? there is no substitute for real-world quarter-mile 
  times where tire adhesion, engine power band, shifting, aerodynamics, 
  etc. are also taken into account concurrently.

  Not to mention one of the most important factors; the driver's abilities and 
proficiencies, or lack of, to operate it at its highest efficiency under all 
the different prevailing circumstances of every moment! 
  73, -=Rog-K9RB=-
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>