To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig? |
From: | klycotek01@home.com (Frank Gilmore) |
Date: | Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:07:48 -0500 |
Some of my most frustrating experiences have been with Kenwood....both as a former ham dealer and as a user. Purchased a new TS-940 loaded to the gills when they came out. Great radio...when it worked. It made many trips back for main CPU replacements among other things. I could never get anyone to talk about it via telephone or letter. I sold it. TenTec has a very good PR reputation which has held them in strong competition against everyone else. Reading all the comments on DSP today (and for months) I agree with many but most of us can suffer some tradeoffs for the overall engineering and durability of the Pegasus-Jupiter. The one that I can't convince myself to live with however is the CW note problem. Many 'reasons' for the problem have been offered but no one seems able to cure it. Was amused at the Jupiter review in QST where the author was trying to describe the strange note without really lambasting it. 73, Frank K0JPJ ex-W5PVX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig?, wo8l@att.net |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] Ten Tec SSB User's Net, JBeamer@PanAmSat.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig?, wo8l@att.net |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] DSP Engine in New Rig?, <k5rov@arrl.net (James Parsons) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |