Hi Kirk
RITTY is a DOS program. It works very well but has no logging
capability on its own. WriteLog, a Windows program, is able to run
RITTY and do the usual things such as highlighting received calls to
show their dupe/mult status, etc. The combination works well but I'd
rather use TR.
However, I suspect that marrying TR and RITTY would be a big project
fraught with difficulties so I'm not holding my breath.
73 de Jim Smith VE7FO Reluctant WL user for RTTY
K4RO Kirk Pickering wrote:
>RITTY would be nice, as would MMTTY support.
>But I believe this is beyond the scope of the
>current TR RTTY capabilities. We're into Windows
>territory woth those applications.
>
>My solution is to simply wire a parallel audio
>stream to a Windows computer running MMTTY, etc.
>It's kind of like diversity reception, but with
>one RX and one ANT.
>
>Now if TR could detect, highlight, and feed calls
>to the program a-la WF1B, THAT would be cool, and
>is probably more do-able in TR-Log.
>
>-Kirk K4RO
>
>On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:19:34PM -0800, Jim Smith wrote:
>
>>Here's another one. Hope I'm not stepping in anything here.
>>
>>I wish RITTY could be interfaced to TR as I find it way better for weak
>>signals than my PK-232. I currently use WriteLog for RTTY so that I can
>>use RITTY (and the PK-232 for a 2nd opinion on what was received).
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Trlog mailing list
>Trlog@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/trlog
>
|