Thanks, Roger. Think I'll be OK at either 1/3 or 1/2.
Do either of you have any idea about the time required or the cost involved?
Thanks and Merry Christmas
Scott
Scott Redd
Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy (Retired)
Chairman and President, JSR Associates, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rhackler@mindspring.com [mailto:rhackler@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: Scott Redd K0DQ
> Cc: Sherman Banks (W4ATL); Scott K0DQ; SECC
> Subject: RE: [SECC] Cobb County Tower Query
>
>
> It is my understanding that the Cobb County code requires that
> the tower be no
> closer than half the height of the tower from the property line.
> That is to
> say that a 70 foot tower could be no closer than 35 feet from the line. I
> think that Dekalb, Gwinette, and Fulton have a more reasonable limit of
> one-third the height.
>
> I could be wrong, so I think checking with Jim or Susan is a good idea.
>
> 73 de KN6RO
>
> Roger L. Hackler
> Senior Systems Engineer
> Siemens Energy & Automation
> Atlanta, GA
>
> On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 21:58:52 -0500 Scott Redd K0DQ
> <k0dq@analog.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, shipmate. Good info.
> >
> > 73 Scott
> >
> > Scott Redd
> > Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy (Retired)
> > Chairman and President, JSR Associates, Inc.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sherman Banks (W4ATL)
> > [mailto:w4atl@arrl.net]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 8:30 PM
> > > To: Scott K0DQ
> > > Cc: SECC
> > > Subject: RE: [SECC] Cobb County Tower Query
> > >
> > >
> > > Jim Altman, W4UCK, was the ARRL legal advisor
> > that I consulted with when I
> > > put up my tower in Cobb and when I moved to
> > Dekalb. Basically,
> > > you go apply
> > > for a building permit. You take a copy of
> > your propertyt layout that you
> > > got at your closing and mark where your tower
> > will be on the property in
> > > relation to the house and the property lines.
> > Most metro counties have a
> > > 75' limit, I think. And the tower must be
> > 1/3 the height from a property
> > > line. Then you draw up how tall the tower
> > will be, guying, etc. A copy of
> > > the appropriate page of the Rohn catalog will
> > help. Once you put
> > > the tower
> > > up, then call the inspector to check it out
> > and sign the building permit.
> > >
> > > It might help to check with W4UCK in case it
> > is different from when I did
> > > it. If you can't get in touch with W4UCK,
> > contact our section manager:
> > >
> > > Susan K. Swiderski, AF4FO
> > > 772 Camelot Way
> > > Norcross, GA 30071-3005
> > > 770-449-0369
> > > af4fo@arrl.org
> > >
> > > She will get you in touch with the right
> > people to guide you through what
> > > you need to do.
> > >
> > > GL es 73 de W4ATL
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: secc-admin@contesting.com
> > [mailto:secc-admin@contesting.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Scott K0DQ
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:38 PM
> > > To: secc@contesting.com
> > > Subject: [SECC] Cobb County Tower Query
> > >
> > >
> > > Would appreciate hearing from anyone with
> > somewhat recent experience in
> > > putting up tower in Cobb County (Atlanta
> > suburb). Have private,
> > > wooded acre
> > > behind house just outside subdivision and
> > thinking about putting something
> > > up, probably in the 60-70 foot range (i.e.
> > not W4AN south). Wondering how
> > > difficult the process is and/or any
> > experience with ex post facto
> > > enforcement (i.e. putting up first, asking
> > forgiveness later).
> > >
> > > Private responses fine, will forward if
> > anyone else interested.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Blessings to all
> > >
> > > Scott K0DQ/ P40Q / A92Q
> > >
> > > Scott Redd
> > > Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy (Retired)
> > > Chairman and President, JSR Associates, Inc.
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: secc-admin@contesting.com
> > [mailto:secc-admin@contesting.com]On
> > > > Behalf Of secc-request@contesting.com
> > > > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:01 PM
> > > > To: secc@contesting.com
> > > > Subject: SECC digest, Vol 1 #243 - 2 msgs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Send SECC mailing list submissions to
> > > > secc@contesting.com
> > > >
> > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World
> > Wide Web, visit
> > > >
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> > > > or, via email, send a message with subject
> > or body 'help' to
> > > > secc-request@contesting.com
> > > >
> > > > You can reach the person managing the list
> > at
> > > > secc-admin@contesting.com
> > > >
> > > > When replying, please edit your Subject
> > line so it is more specific
> > > > than "Re: Contents of SECC digest..."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today's Topics:
> > > >
> > > > 1. 10 Meter Test (John Chmielewski)
> > > > 2. Re: 10 Meter Test (K4SB)
> > > >
> > > > --__--__--
> > > >
> > > > Message: 1
> > > > Reply-To: n2xd@earthlink.net
> > > > From: "John Chmielewski"
> > > > To: "secc"
> > > > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:29:35 -00
> > > > Subject: [SECC] 10 Meter Test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Managed to work around 22 hrs this year.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SOHP SSB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > QSO's 1374
> > > >
> > > > Points 2748
> > > >
> > > > Mults 58
> > > >
> > > > Countries 78
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Final Score 373,728
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > John N2XD
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- John Chmielewski
> > > >
> > > > --- n2xd@earthlink.net
> > > >
> > > > --- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real
> > Internet.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
> > parts ---
> > > > text/html (html body -- converted)
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > --__--__--
> > > >
> > > > Message: 2
> > > > Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:31:44 +0000
> > > > From: K4SB
> > > > To: secc
> > > > Subject: Re: [SECC] 10 Meter Test
> > > >
> > > > Well, total time was about 13 hours..Band
> > was fine Fri. evening and
> > > > Sat. morning, but things seemed to go to
> > hell for a few hours in the
> > > > afternoon. Weird paths, signals with aurora
> > flutter, and such.
> > > >
> > > > Brought up the packet calls by DX summit on
> > Monday, and it seems there
> > > > were tons of more mults and operators on
> > SSB than CW. Did a rough
> > > > count and the ratio seemed to be about
> > > > 4:1
> > > >
> > > > Anyway, log is in with credit to the SECC.
> > ( damned rabbit took it the
> > > > first time )
> > > >
> > > > Single Op Low Power CW only
> > > >
> > > > 720 Qs
> > > > 71 Countries
> > > > 61 Sections ( Wy and NE were the last of
> > the 50 States )
> > > >
> > > > Score 381,216
> > > >
> > > > And btw, thanks to KU8E....I was beginning
> > to expect I was going to
> > > > miss GA. His QSO nr was probably well into
> > the 500s.
> > > >
> > > > 73
> > > > Ed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --__--__--
> > > >
> > > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > > SECC mailing list
> > > > SECC@contesting.com
> > > >
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > End of SECC Digest
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > > SECC mailing list
> > > SECC@contesting.com
> > >
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SECC mailing list
> > SECC@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> >
>
>
>
|