Jim Altman, W4UCK, was the ARRL legal advisor that I consulted with when I
put up my tower in Cobb and when I moved to Dekalb. Basically, you go apply
for a building permit. You take a copy of your propertyt layout that you
got at your closing and mark where your tower will be on the property in
relation to the house and the property lines. Most metro counties have a
75' limit, I think. And the tower must be 1/3 the height from a property
line. Then you draw up how tall the tower will be, guying, etc. A copy of
the appropriate page of the Rohn catalog will help. Once you put the tower
up, then call the inspector to check it out and sign the building permit.
It might help to check with W4UCK in case it is different from when I did
it. If you can't get in touch with W4UCK, contact our section manager:
Susan K. Swiderski, AF4FO
772 Camelot Way
Norcross, GA 30071-3005
770-449-0369
af4fo@arrl.org
She will get you in touch with the right people to guide you through what
you need to do.
GL es 73 de W4ATL
-----Original Message-----
From: secc-admin@contesting.com [mailto:secc-admin@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of Scott K0DQ
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:38 PM
To: secc@contesting.com
Subject: [SECC] Cobb County Tower Query
Would appreciate hearing from anyone with somewhat recent experience in
putting up tower in Cobb County (Atlanta suburb). Have private, wooded acre
behind house just outside subdivision and thinking about putting something
up, probably in the 60-70 foot range (i.e. not W4AN south). Wondering how
difficult the process is and/or any experience with ex post facto
enforcement (i.e. putting up first, asking forgiveness later).
Private responses fine, will forward if anyone else interested.
Thanks
Blessings to all
Scott K0DQ/ P40Q / A92Q
Scott Redd
Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy (Retired)
Chairman and President, JSR Associates, Inc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: secc-admin@contesting.com [mailto:secc-admin@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of secc-request@contesting.com
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 1:01 PM
> To: secc@contesting.com
> Subject: SECC digest, Vol 1 #243 - 2 msgs
>
>
> Send SECC mailing list submissions to
> secc@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> secc-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> secc-admin@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of SECC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. 10 Meter Test (John Chmielewski)
> 2. Re: 10 Meter Test (K4SB)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Reply-To: n2xd@earthlink.net
> From: "John Chmielewski" <n2xd@earthlink.net>
> To: "secc" <secc@contesting.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:29:35 -00
> Subject: [SECC] 10 Meter Test
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Managed to work around 22 hrs this year.
>
>
> SOHP SSB
>
>
> QSO's 1374
>
> Points 2748
>
> Mults 58
>
> Countries 78
>
>
> Final Score 373,728
>
>
>
> John N2XD
>
>
> --- John Chmielewski
>
> --- n2xd@earthlink.net
>
> --- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> text/html (html body -- converted)
> ---
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:31:44 +0000
> From: K4SB <hamcat@directvinternet.com>
> To: secc <secc@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [SECC] 10 Meter Test
>
> Well, total time was about 13 hours..Band was fine Fri. evening and
> Sat. morning, but things seemed to go to hell for a few hours in the
> afternoon. Weird paths, signals with aurora flutter, and such.
>
> Brought up the packet calls by DX summit on Monday, and it seems there
> were tons of more mults and operators on SSB than CW. Did a rough
> count and the ratio seemed to be about
> 4:1
>
> Anyway, log is in with credit to the SECC. ( damned rabbit took it the
> first time )
>
> Single Op Low Power CW only
>
> 720 Qs
> 71 Countries
> 61 Sections ( Wy and NE were the last of the 50 States )
>
> Score 381,216
>
> And btw, thanks to KU8E....I was beginning to expect I was going to
> miss GA. His QSO nr was probably well into the 500s.
>
> 73
> Ed
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
>
> End of SECC Digest
>
>
_______________________________________________
SECC mailing list
SECC@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
|