Subject: | [SECC] Tie-breaker |
---|---|
From: | k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed) |
Date: | Wed, 06 Jun 2001 16:24:24 +0000 |
Jay Pryor wrote: > > The possibility exists that we could have a tie for one or more of the > spots for the SECC nomination for WRTC-2002. I see no reason why the "tie vote" could not be voted on by the membership at large. Simply establish a deadline for the original vote, a deadline for the "tiebreaker" and let it go. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, n4uk@mindspring.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [SECC] IMPORTANT REMINDER, Jay Pryor |
Previous by Thread: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, John Laney |
Next by Thread: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, n4uk@mindspring.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |