RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] (no subject)

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] (no subject)
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:26:37 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
 > I may be missing something here, but how are the newer rigs generating
 > FSK ? Are they shifting xtals or just sideband tones ?

Depending on the design they are using different approaches ... some
are generating audio tones (at a fixed level relative to the carrier
oscillator into the balanced modulator),  some are directly shifting
the frequency of the carrier oscillator (a synthesizer, not a crystal)
and one is directly generating the FSK signal using DSP at a low IF.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 8/23/2011 6:06 PM, Ed wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 05:53 PM, Larry Gauthier (K8UT) wrote:
>> In theory the transmitted signals are the same.
>> In practice they are often very different.
>>
>> As others have pointed out, many AFSK operators overdrive their mic inputs,
>> or transmit audio tones whose frequency is so low that the second (and third
>> and fourth) harmonics fall within the bandpass of the transmitted sideband
>> signal. The result is broad, splattering signals or signals with multiple
>> spikes beyond the primary RTTY signal. It's not a pretty sight, and the
>> receiving end definitely knows the difference.
>>
>> -larry
>> K8UT
>
> I may be missing something here, but how are the newer rigs generating
> FSK ? Are they shifting xtals or just sideband tones ?
>
> Ed W3NR
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>