RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question

To: "David VE3VID" <ve3vid@hotmail.com>, "RTTY contest group" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question
From: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@inbox.com>
Reply-to: Jim W7RY <w7ry@inbox.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:52:16 -0700
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
FSK is MUCH better than AFSK.... What are you using for a computer and 
software?  I use windows XP and MMTTY with N1MM. Works just fine in FSK 
mode.

Is there a particular reason you don't want to run FSK?

73
Jim W7RY


--------------------------------------------------
From: "David VE3VID" <ve3vid@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 6:48 PM
To: "RTTY contest group" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question

>
> Wow.  Well if thats the case it was an expensive waste of $300.
>
> However, why would the filters be unusable in AFSK(LSB)?  Dont they just 
> narrow the IF bandpass to 400hz?
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: w7why@frontier.com
>> To: rtty@contesting.com
>> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 18:43:48 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] INRAD filter question
>>
>> Hi David
>>
>> I have the same setup as you--2 Inrad filters. They won't work in AFSK.
>> You have to run FSK to use the narrow CW filters. 73
>> Tom W7WHY
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Ummmm.......nope. I had the rig in LSB (AFSK). And the tone pair as set
>> > by MMTTY is 2125/170
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.856 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3159 - Release Date: 09/25/10 
> 10:45:00
> 
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>