A great op using SO2R probably has an advantage. So do ops with 200 ft
towers, big amps, 11k rigs, hardline, stacks etc.
What I hear is a bunch of people that do not want to change and embrace
something that would make them better scores.
So I guess operators should be judged and put in their own categories
because they are better than you? Really?
CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
W0MU.NET or 67.40.148.194
"A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may
never get over." Ben Franklin
-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Haack
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 5:11 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] cheating
Joe,
If you can sit there and honestly tell this group that an SO2R station does
not have a distinct advantage, Fine.
Then you would have no objection to a Single Operator, Single Transmitter
Rule.
Certainly would even out the field, And since there is no advantage to be
had by having two radios....
The distinctions between a SO1R and SO2R are of the same types that
cause other sports to create brackets, classes, and power rankings.
Its done to allow a fair and reasonable competitive contest for all
competitors.
There will be operators who will find an advantage one way or another.
Having the Varsity squad play the Pro Team shouldn't be one of them.
Mike WB9B
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|