That entirely depends on the operator's preferences, I personally see that
as a major disadvantage, to me N1MM Logger is way ahead because its
algorithm recognizes callsigns on its own without relying on an existing
database, in other words it will highlight new and special callsigns before
they make it to the database. But that's just me.
73,
Julio VE3FH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@adelphia.net>
To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Mar 05, 2007 10:55
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 2007 RTTY Contesting Survey Results
>
>
>
> There is one major advantage to Writelog for RTTY. Writelog
> takes the incoming character stream and compares it against
> the AA5AU database for possible embedded callsigns. For
> example, in the sequence FDR8EK7WM6CVDF, Writelog will
> highlight K7WM as a callsign. Just press the ENTER key and
> K7WM 599 CA will be sent. If you are on the receiving end of
> a pileup, or if copy is marginal, this feature is
> invaluable. N1MM needs a nice clean freestanding word that
> "looks" like a generic callsign before it will identify the
> word as a callsign.
>
> Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
> Yuma, AZ
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|