RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band

To: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>,"RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band
From: DJ3IW Götz <goetzlin@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:29:38 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
And it's only the RTTY community that is usually accused..

73 de Goetz, DJ3IW
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
To: "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: [RTTY] Fw: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band


> It seems as if "we" (RTTY operators) have, once again, been falsely 
> accused?
>
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Warren" <nt5c@texas.net>
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 9:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB in CW band
>
>
>
> The 40M band just isn't big enough, and a major contest in any mode
> spills over "normal" boundaries, and gets the folks on the other
> modes mad. CW contesters are just the same. In a major contest they
> go up to 7065+, and screw up much of the SSB DX band. Worst of all 
> is
> RTTY, because they seem to have more contests, and can't agree where
> their band is. Some think it's just below 7040, and others 7070 up!
>
> 73, John, NT5C.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>