RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] LED Street lights

To: Michael Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] LED Street lights
From: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI via RFI" <rfi@contesting.com>
Reply-to: "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:03:48 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Yes, in my experience, the "bad rap" that industry gets is usually not as bad 
as it is portrayed.  Even some in the BPL industry were exceptionally 
cooperative and that evolved into industry standards to protect amateur radio 
that made it into the ITU-R regulations on BPL.  Time and time again, I found 
cooperation from most of industry, so I always approach them assuming 
cooperation and, to one degree or another, I am usually right.

The solar industry is a good example. Yes, there are problems, but we have 4 
different manufacturers actively engaged in taking steps that have resolved 
most of the RFI issues and continuing to stay engaged and working on solutions 
for the remaining problems. It's not a perfect process, but I can guarantee we 
will get more out of industry directly through cooperation than we would by 
being confrontational and trying to resolve the issues through enforcement.
________________________________
From: Michael Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 7:13 AM
To: Hare, Ed, W1RFI <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] LED Street lights

Ed, you're going to have fun with that. In the 80s i did an RFI study on med 
base fluorescent lights. I phoned all the major manufacturers and explain to 
them what I was doing and who I was doing it for. Each manufacturer sent me one 
of every bulb they made for the test. They cooperated like they really cared. 
Many bulbs were discontinued because of the results of my testing. I think I 
remember Lights of America (LOA) model 2030 as being the worst.

Michael Martin
RFI Services
51 W Bay Front Rd
Lothian, MD 20711

240-508-3760
mike@rfiservices.com<mailto:mike@rfiservices.com>
www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023, 6:35 AM Hare, Ed, W1RFI via RFI 
<rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>> wrote:
There is nothing incorrect in what Jim Brown said at all, and he is certainly 
NOT telling people not to start near the device.  He is explaining a nuance 
that is important to understand to avoid a common troubleshooting error.

For the most part, on HF, devices themselves do not radiate much, but the wires 
that they are connected to do.  That is what Jim is explaining.

How that radiation decays with distance depends on how the noise is being 
conducted onto the wiring.  If the wiring were reasonably well balanced, acting 
like a leaky transmission line, the strength of the noise would decay at about 
60 dB/distance decade within about 0.16 wavelength from the source and/or the 
source wiring.  If the noise is conducted to the wiring as a common-mode 
signal, the decay rate would be lower and, if the wires are long in terms of 
wavelength, a standing wave along them is often developed, with peaks and 
valleys that can very much confound locating the actual device source.

To understand what Jim Brown is telling you, think of an LED bulb. It is too 
small to be an effective HF antenna, but those long wires it is connected to 
can be great antennas. If the noise from an LED street light conducts around 
(or through) the step-down transformer it is connected to and gets onto those 
overhead distribution lines, it can radiate for quite a distance an in some 
instances, may be stronger at some point other than right at the pole it is 
attached to, depending on what antenna you are using for receive. (A loop 
receive antenna may show a NULL when the null is pointed at the source, and as 
you drive away, that null will disaappear.)

I have retired from HQ, but still volunteer there (quite a bit of time on this 
SMC HF petition.)  One of my late summer projects is going to be to set up a 
moble noise-measurement system, using accurate equipment, and by late fall, I 
expect to be making measurements of noise over large geographical areas.  
Measuring the noise from an LED street-lighthing system in an entire community 
should be quite the challenge.

>From what I have seen in some of the temporary setups I have used over the 
>years, and from just listening on a receiver, most of the LED street lights 
>seem to be RF quiet.   From the reports I have seen, some are not.

What I don't have is make and model number of the LED bulbs that are causing a 
problem.  I am sure I can persuade the ARRL Lab to buy one and we can make 
measurements of its conducted emissions.  That will be a good starting point.  
If FCC follows its own lead on past decisions, it will proclaim those overhead 
lines to be "non-residential" environments, as it did for BPL over a decade 
ago, even for street lights in residential neighborhood.

Ed Hare, W1RFI, ARRL Lab Volunteer





________________________________
From: RFI 
<rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org@contesting.com<mailto:arrl.org@contesting.com>> on 
behalf of AA5CT via RFI <rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2023 9:27 PM
To: rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com> 
<rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>>; Jim Brown 
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com<mailto:jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>>
Subject: Re: [RFI] LED Street lights

I don't know where you're coming from Jim. How long has it been since you've 
been in the 'field' with a portable SW receiver?


Noisy devices, power poles, even lighting poles all have distinctive signatures 
heard when standing near them. The CLOSER you get the STRONGER will be whatever 
noise/signal the device *may* be generating. Surely this aspect need not be 
spelled out?


I still stand with the advice as a first tier investigation to GET NEAR THE 
DEVICE and inspect the ham bands for any anomalous noise. This isn't rocket 
science. This e-mail was a response to Eric for advice looking at a NEWLY 
installed LED lighting pole. Eric, if you have a SW/HF radio in the car that 
might be a way to do a first tier/first pass inspection of the new lighting 
pole too.


 de AA5CT Jim

---------------------------------



    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023, 7:54:53 PM GMT-5, Jim Brown 
<jim@audiosystemsgroup.com<mailto:jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>> wrote:

 On 8/23/2023 5:17 PM, AA5CT via RFI wrote:
> Hmmm ... if an exotic receive apparatus is required to 'spot the noise', how 
> serious could the noise really be?

Not all noise is broadband. Indeed, most electronic noise is not. And
the receiver cited makes an excellent spectrum analyzer. Most noise is
radiated by wiring, not by the fixtures themselves.

NK7Z's webpage provides lots of excellent troubleshooting advice for
chasing electronic noise.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>