I think Kim has it right here, contrasting PROACTIVE with REACTIVE. When
we identify screwed-up equipment like ballasts and wireless cameras and
that sort of thing with a very specific problem and tied to specific
models and manufacturers, it's straightforward for the FCC to deal with
the problem in a limited and bounded way, and they usually do. That's
why documented evidence is so important in supporting any kind of
regulatory action. But just railing against classes of devices creating
interference is going to go nowhere at the agency level, regardless of
what the regulations may say or imply.
You must clearly understand what Ward was told. It punts to "no additional funding for PROACTIVE
RFI enforcement," NOT "no funds for RFI enforcement." The > FCC has finding only
for reactive RFI enforcement, not proactive RFI enforcement. Do the have authority? Yes. Do they have
the ability to exercise it in
proactive manner? No.
What's the solution? Funding and spending authority. Kim N5OP
Exactly. The FCC currently has no congressional mandate to go out and
aggressively hassle importers about interference-related issues. There
is no reason or incentive for them to pick a fight with industry
lobbyists over interference to us. We will be far better off to
continue to make well-documented cases contesting specific types and
instances of interference in order to support the general case when an
opportunity presents itself to do so. That is why it's important to
support spectrum defense efforts and why the ARRL Lab's traceable,
calibrated work on RFI is so valuable. A solid technical case was the
foundation for the ARRL being able to prevail on the merits of the BPL
case.
There will eventually be some recognition by both industry and
regulators that the RF spectrum is not an infinite ocean into which
electromagnetic pollution can be harmlessly dumped. That day is not
here yet - it usually takes some kind of spectacular incident to get and
hold the necessary attention to achieve a response. In the meantime,
document problems and solutions, educate your representatives (and
neighbors) about the technical issues and the need for regulatory
oversight, and support organizations such as the ARRL in their efforts
to develop and sustain the necessary body of technical work.
73, Ward N0AX
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|