To: | orion@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [Orion] Re: Jupiter vs ORION |
From: | Allan Henry Kaplan <w1ael@mindspring.com> |
Date: | Mon, 08 Mar 2004 00:32:58 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:orion@contesting.com> |
Dick, N5XRD wrote, "What I am wondering is what practical difference is there between the two for a non-contester ham with a small station, considering the difference in price. Incidentally, is there any difference between RX on the Jupiter and on the Sub-receiver on the Orion??" Jupiter performance will satisfy the 90+ percent of hams who rarely compete in contests. It is a very good value for a non-contester ham with a small station. People buy ORION radios for two reasons, either: (A) They need a contest-grade radio, or (B) They want the newest and best transceiver that Ten-Tec makes. The ORION Subreceiver is fairly similar to Jupiter, as far as RF performance is concerned, but the ORION Subreceiver has a more advanced DSP, and ORION has a very versatile antenna switch that makes two xmit/rcv antennas and one receive only antenna available to its receivers. Hope this helps. 73, Allan, W1AEL (Ten-Tec retiree). _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [Orion] Jupiter compared to Orion, Richard Hemingway |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Orion] Re: Jupiter vs ORION, john, ke5c |
Previous by Thread: | [Orion] Jupiter compared to Orion, Richard Hemingway |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Orion] Re: Jupiter vs ORION, john, ke5c |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |