Jim,
Sounds like a good approach to me. However, with NA you only have two
choices - all bands, or your band only. With these choices, "your band
only" should not attempt to descriminate between phone and CW on 40M, and
probably 160M as well.
I think the function is broke in NA - we should make it work as you
describe.
Dave
Jim Reisert AD1C
<jjreisert@alum.mi To: <NA-USER@contesting.com>
t.edu> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [NA-User] TO4T
na-user-admin@cont
esting.com
03/05/2002 04:03
AM
At 12:31 AM 3/5/2002 -0500, k8cc wrote:
>We saw this same problem at K8CC and had to use the same workaround. The
>problem comes because people don't want to see CW spots during an SSB
>contest and vica versa, and how do you tell on 160 or 40 whether a spot is
>CW or phone simply by the frequency data? On all the other bands it can
>be done. (OK, maybe 80 is a little funny.) I thought we had this one
>fixed but I guess not. We'll have to take a look at this.
We did not filter 40 meters at all at KC1XX. I think I saw 5 CW spots the
whole weekend, and hundreds of SSB spots. For me it was a non-issue.
73 - Jim AD1C
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
_______________________________________________
NA-User mailing list
NA-User@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/na-user
****************************************************************************
The information contained in this transmission, which may be
confidential and proprietary, is only for the intended recipients.
Unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. If you receive this
transmission in error, please notify me immediately by telephone
or electronic mail and confirm that you deleted this transmission
and the reply from your electronic mail system.
****************************************************************************
|