Terry is correct here. Full Duplex is only reached if you have the exact
same data going up and down stream. If this is true then you get the
theoretical 22Mbps.
Doug Harman
KarlNet, Inc.
525 Metro Place North
Suite 100
Dublin, OH 43017
614 822-5275 x 123
614 822-0024 fax
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Terry Bomersbach
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:25 AM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
>
>
> I think you missed the picture here. If you try to download something
> assuming full duplex, it's still only going to be able to
> download the file
> at the maximum speed of a single pipe and no more. There isn't
> any way for
> it to download at the speed of both pipes for a combined d/l speed of
> 22mbits.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul C. Diem <PCDiem@FoxValley.net>
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 10:20 PM
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
>
>
> >Exactly, which makes it full duplex since it does not have to share the
> >pipe between sending and receiving. The question is, why is the
> throughput
> >worse?
> >
> >Paul C. Diem
> >PCDiem@FoxValley.net
> >
> >On Wed, 8 May 2002, Terry Bomersbach wrote:
> >
> >> This might be considered full duplex of sorts but it sounds more like
> load
> >> balancing. Take outbound traffic on one pipe, inbound on the
> other pipe.
> >>
> >> It's not actually sending data out on both pipes, only sending
> responses
> out
> >> on one pipe and receiving information on the other.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul C. Diem <PCDiem@foxvalley.net>
> >> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM
> >> Subject: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
> >>
> >>
> >> >Has anyone ever configured an AP-1000 with KarlNet ISP Base to do full
> >> >duplex? According to the online help, you can set a backup
> interface and
> >> >check the Perm checkbox. This will make it send data over the backup
> >> >interface and receive data over the primary interface
> effectively making
> a
> >> >full duplex link.
> >> >
> >> >I've tried setting it up this way on the base end (interface 2 is
> primary
> >> >on channel 1 and interface 3 is backup on channel 11) and the exact
> >> >opposite (interface 2 is backup on channel 1 and interface 3
> is primary
> on
> >> >channel 11). The ping fill test drops from about 7mbps to 2.5mbps.
> >> >
> >> >Is there something I'm missing?
> >> >
> >> >Paul C. Diem
> >> >PCDiem@FoxValley.net
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Karlnet mailing list
> >> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Karlnet mailing list
> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
|