Exactly, which makes it full duplex since it does not have to share the
pipe between sending and receiving. The question is, why is the throughput
worse?
Paul C. Diem
PCDiem@FoxValley.net
On Wed, 8 May 2002, Terry Bomersbach wrote:
> This might be considered full duplex of sorts but it sounds more like load
> balancing. Take outbound traffic on one pipe, inbound on the other pipe.
>
> It's not actually sending data out on both pipes, only sending responses out
> on one pipe and receiving information on the other.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul C. Diem <PCDiem@foxvalley.net>
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM
> Subject: [Karlnet] Full Duplex KarlNet
>
>
> >Has anyone ever configured an AP-1000 with KarlNet ISP Base to do full
> >duplex? According to the online help, you can set a backup interface and
> >check the Perm checkbox. This will make it send data over the backup
> >interface and receive data over the primary interface effectively making a
> >full duplex link.
> >
> >I've tried setting it up this way on the base end (interface 2 is primary
> >on channel 1 and interface 3 is backup on channel 11) and the exact
> >opposite (interface 2 is backup on channel 1 and interface 3 is primary on
> >channel 11). The ping fill test drops from about 7mbps to 2.5mbps.
> >
> >Is there something I'm missing?
> >
> >Paul C. Diem
> >PCDiem@FoxValley.net
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Karlnet mailing list
> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
|