[ct-user] CT 9.46 and NAQP

[Ken Wolff" <kwolff@ultranet.com (Ken Wolff)]

I started work on it, then discovered the CT binary record doesn't have a
place to stash the "location" info. Does anybody have an opinion on the
worst case length of a name and location? I think I can shoehorn the data
into the current 50 byte CT record.

- Ken

--
Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
Questions:                owner-ct-user@contesting.com