I think the “Assisted as Multi” is Tree trying to be nice to people who don’t
read rules. Rule 6 says (to me) that single op assisted is a check log. It says
so right in Rule 6. You can put in the soapbox that you ran assisted and did it
purposely for whatever reason.
I didn’t CQ at all so didn’t have a sense of the pileups. But a few times when
I found some odd DX station the pile built pretty quickly…
Ken K6MR
From: Mike Smith VE9AA<mailto:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 4:21 PM
To: 'Ken K6MR'<mailto:k6mr@outlook.com>;
cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet
Agree 100% Ken. If you look at 3830 (which is only a fraction of the actual
entrants) you’ll see many multiops that only list one operator.(mostly the LP
gang I think)
True, I suppose its possible some of the fellows filling in the 3830 form
simply forgot to list all the guys at the station that night. (unlikely, but
could happen)
Others, however, are apparently of the belief that a Multiop means single op +
packet. (guess they never read the rules or are creating/justifying their own
rules somehow in their mind)
I certainly do not speak for the Boring ARC , nor the SP contest,. but if my
ears are to be believed (packet pileups last night) along with 3830 posts and
misinformed (but perhaps well intended) posts like the ones I see from W0MU,
then it would appear at first glance that either folks are using packet and
just putting themselves in a multiop category because they believe that’s what
they are supposed to do (per ARRL convention) or something else I have not yet
thought of.
Disappointed? Yes.
Surprised? Sadly, no not really.
Part of the problem may be the way the rules are written or they are becoming
watered down. I snipped this from the logs rec’d page mere moments ago. Look
for the word assisted:
“2016 STEW PERRY
This report generated on Sunday, 18-Dec-16 at 14:58.
Total logs = 436
C = Category (CheckLog, Multi or Single). ASSISTED classified as Multi….”
Mike VE9AA FN66
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
From: Ken K6MR [mailto:k6mr@outlook.com]
Sent: December 18, 2016 8:08 PM
To: Mike Smith VE9AA; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet
Mike:
Rule 6. Seems pretty plain to me. Packet is not allowed for single op, and
discouraged for Multi op. Local skimmers appear to be ok, but grudgingly.
SP appears to be an attempt to hold on to “Boy and his Radio” (copyright K0HB)
contesting. Kinda like Stew did himself, as I read the history.
Fine by me.
Ken K6MR
From: Mike Smith VE9AA<mailto:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 1:10 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet
The Stew Perry contest is not an ARRL event, so entering in Multi Op does
not mean "Single Op + Packet"
I was surprised at a few mini packet pileups I had last night. Now I know
why.
After reviewing the DX Cluster today and reading 3830 it's apparent nobody
reads rules anymore.
In all fairness, there were a couple guys using skimmer/telnet/cluster
submitting properly as checklogs as they were chasing new countries or
whatever.
I would suggest to the Boring Club to clarify this point in the multi op
rules. (ie: Multi Op does not mean Single Op + Packet).
Mike VE9AA
Mike, Coreen & Corey
Keswick Ridge, NB
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|