CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet

To: Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet
From: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:08:03 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Mike:



Rule 6. Seems pretty plain to me. Packet is not allowed for single op, and 
discouraged for Multi op. Local skimmers appear to be ok, but grudgingly.



SP appears to be an attempt to hold on to “Boy and his Radio” (copyright K0HB) 
contesting.  Kinda like Stew did himself, as I read the history.



Fine by me.



Ken K6MR



From: Mike Smith VE9AA<mailto:ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016 1:10 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Stew Contest and Multi Op/packet



The Stew Perry contest is not an ARRL event, so entering in Multi Op does
not mean "Single Op + Packet"

I was surprised at a few mini packet pileups I had last night.  Now I know
why.



After reviewing the DX Cluster today and reading 3830 it's apparent nobody
reads rules anymore.



In all fairness, there were a couple guys using skimmer/telnet/cluster
submitting properly as checklogs as they were chasing new countries or
whatever.



I would suggest to the Boring Club to clarify this point in the multi op
rules. (ie: Multi Op does not mean Single Op + Packet).



Mike VE9AA



Mike, Coreen & Corey

Keswick Ridge, NB



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>