CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Logger comparisons (was Linux Logging Programs)

To: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Logger comparisons (was Linux Logging Programs)
From: Ken K6MR <k6mr@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:21:22 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As a convert from N1MM to DXLog.net (which is very similar to Win-Test) I found 
N1MM to be too mouse-centric. Turning options on/off, changing messages, seemed 
to always require opening some form from a mouse menu. Win-Test and DXLog.net 
have a rich set of text commands that are typed directly into the log line. 
Easy and quick. I’m also a terrible typist and it’s much simpler to edit a 
previous qso without losing time grabbing the mouse, selecting, blah, blah. 
Just up arrow, tab, edit, and back. Saves me from myself.

Both Win-Test and DXLog.net also have an extensive scripting capability (which 
I’m still learning) that makes it possible to add features that may not be 
supported by the base program. N6TV has written a treasure trove of scripts for 
Win-Test and the K3 that automate and/or simplify operation.  My only 
complaints with Win-Test is the rather clunky (for me) SO2R second radio 
interface, and the inability of the user to add new contest configurations. 

Particular to DXLog.net, I use the MicroHam u2R accessory outputs to automate 
my antenna selections. DXLog.net includes a nice antenna selection window with 
single key selection of available antennas for a band. Similar to the N1MM 
setup except there is a window that always shows active and available antennas 
for the band you are on (for each radio). And full rotator integration with 
PSTRotator.

When I was active around 2004 I used N1MM for a year or two. When I became 
active again last year I downloaded/bought every program out there and tried 
them all. That’s the wonderful thing about choice: there is always something 
for everyone.  

Ken K6MR




From: Jim Brown
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 12:37
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Linux Logging Programs


On Tue,10/20/2015 2:09 AM, Dez Watson wrote:
> Win-Test isn't freeware but in my opinion is worth paying the small fee.

I'm a long time N1MM user, upgraded to Plus a year or so ago. Before 
that, I used WriteLog, switching to N1MM around 2007, not because of 
cost, but because I liked it a lot better. I found N1MM to have more 
useful features, be better supported, and better documented.

I'd be interested in hearing what it is about WinTest that makes it 
better than N1MM Plus. Is it more than "key assignments are like the DOS 
program I used for 15 years before the DOS computer died?"

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Logger comparisons (was Linux Logging Programs), Ken K6MR <=