IMHO, nothing. But was that the intent of the rule change? Are there other
forms of "assistance" that prompted the change?
And, as someone else pointed out, the rule now prohibits changing the log
based on information provided by SCP. Doesn't seem like that was intended,
and given the past history and ubiquitous nature of SCP an explicit
statement would be appropriate.
73, Dick WC1M
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve London [mailto:n2icarrl@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:57 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
>
>
> On 05/21/2015 11:10 PM, Dick Green WC1M wrote:
> > Comments on CWWW Rules 2015:
> >
> > VIII. DEFINITION OF TERMS
> >
> > 2. QSO alerting assistance
>
> > The only thing the change does is prohibit single-frequency CW
> > decoders, which provide no competitive advantage and may be needed by
> > ops with hearing problems.
>
> It doesn't "prohibit" single-frequency CW decoders, it just means that use
of
> a single-frequency CW decoder places you in the Assisted category. What's
> so bad about that ?
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|