CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

To: "n2ic@arrl.net" <n2ic@arrl.net>, Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
From: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:41:21 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am So confused !!!!
 
My .02   "assisted "   KISS .....  means NO  period NO  information   gleaning 
. RF, INTER NET, smart phone
of tablet .......
 
 
Wayne  W3EA
 

 
> From: n2icarrl@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:40:57 -0600
> To: n8hm@arrl.net
> CC: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015
> 
> Then you would say that using a local CW Skimmer is also okay in the 
> unassisted category because it uses your own antennas and computers and 
> equipment ?
> 
> That has never been allowed in the CQWW rules.
> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> 
> On 05/22/2015 10:23 AM, Paul Stoetzer wrote:
> > Because that's not "assistance." It's just a different using a
> > different method to demodulate the signals.
> >
> > There's no real reason to expand the definition of "assistance" from
> > using DX clusters and the RBN. My view is that if you are solely
> > receiving signals using your own antennas and your own computers and
> > equipment, then you are not "assisted."
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Paul, N8HM
> >
> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 05/21/2015 11:10 PM, Dick Green WC1M wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Comments on CWWW Rules 2015:
> >>>
> >>> VIII. DEFINITION OF TERMS
> >>>
> >>> 2. QSO alerting assistance
> >>
> >>
> >>> The only thing the change does is prohibit
> >>> single-frequency CW decoders, which provide no competitive advantage and
> >>> may
> >>> be needed by ops with hearing problems.
> >>
> >>
> >> It doesn't "prohibit" single-frequency CW decoders, it just means that use
> >> of a single-frequency CW decoder places you in the Assisted category. 
> >> What's
> >> so bad about that ?
> >>
> >> 73,
> >> Steve, N2IC
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CQ-Contest mailing list
> >> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
                                          
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>